Legal Opinion · Dissent

Loughman v. Town of Pelham

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 29, 1943No. 43Published

1DissentSwan, Circuit Judge

Under the rule of Tillinghast v. Merrill, 151 N.Y. 135, 45 N.E. 375, 34 L.R.A. 678, 56 Am.St.Rep. 612, a town supervisor was absolutely liable to account for moneys collected by virtue of his office. It was no excuse that he had deposited them in a bank if the bank failed. Yawger v. American Surety Co, 212 N.Y. 292, 297, 106 N.E. 64, L.R.A.1915D, 481. The Town Law of 1909 recognized such absolute liability by requiring a supervisor to give a surety bond to “well and truly keep, pay over and account for all moneys * * * belonging to his town and coming into his hands as such supervisor”.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tillinghast v. . MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Yawger v. . American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Village of Bath v. . McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Baldwin v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Pyrke v. Standard Accident InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API