Legal Opinion

Budget Rent-A-Car Corp. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 19, 1993No. 92SC266PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

This case presents an issue of coverage for no-fault insurance claims asserted by the .plaintiffs 1 against Budget Rent-A-Car Corporation (Budget) for injuries sustained as passengers in a motor vehicle rented in Colorado and involved in an accident in Texas. The trial court granted partial summary judgment for the plaintiffs on the issue of coverage, holding that they were entitled to no-fault personal injury protection insurance benefits under certain provisions of the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act, §§ 10-4-701 to -723, 4A C.R.S. (1987) (the No-Fault Act). 2 In the ensuing jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Kallenberger v. BuchananSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Martin v. Principal Casualty Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Signature Development Companies, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Dunlap v. LongColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. McConnell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Ranger v. Fortune Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Gonzales v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API