Henson Ex Rel. Hunt v. International Paper Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
In this civil action, the court of appeals held that a claim for attractive nuisance requires the injured child to be attracted onto the defendant’s property by the nuisance which causes him or her injury. Although we agree with the disposition reached by the court of appeals, we disagree with the rule found both in its opinion and in our precedent. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals’ decision, but modify it as outlined below.
Factual/Procedural Background
International Paper Company (IPC) owns and operates a canal that runs twenty-seven miles through Georgetown…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Russo v. SuttonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Franks v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Hancock v. Aiken Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Everett Ex Rel. Everett v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clea v. OdomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011