Legal Opinion

State v. Graves

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1963No. 7006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

Appellants seek a reversal of their conviction of the crime of extraordinary burglary.

By reason of our determination of one of the issues raised by appellants, it is unnecessary to state the facts.

The three appellants Graves, Crouch and Whitley, hereafter referred to as defendants, were charged by separate informations, each of which consisted of four counts. The first count upon which the defendants were tried was as follows:

“COUNT ONE
“COMES NOW Patrick F. Hanagan, District Attorney in and for Chaves County, New Mexico, and accuses the Defendant, Roger L. Graves [Eddie Lee…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. People v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. ShroyerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. MosleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. ArchuletaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API