Legal Opinion
Epperson v. The Hertz Corporation
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided October 8, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00383Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION STEPHEN EPPERSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:24-cv-383-SPC-DNF THE HERTZ CORPORATION, Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant the Hertz Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 30). Plaintiff Stephen Epperson responded1 (Doc. 31), and Defendant replied. (Doc. 32). For the below reasons, the Court grants the motion. Background This is an age discrimination and retaliation case. Plaintiff works as a corporate security officer at Hertz. He began his employment there in August 2022. The alleged…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- John M. HAIRSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the GAINESVILLE SUN PUBLISHING CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.