Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Moore v. O'Bannon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 1, 1938No. 27811PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an original action commenced by the state on relation of E. H. Moore for writ of mandamus directing S. L. O’Bannon, as district judge of Okmul-gee county, to approve service by publication had in an action to quiet title filed in that court.
The petition in district court named as defendants “the heirs, executors, administrators, devisees, trustees and assigns, immediate and remote,” of Amster Sugar, deceased. The action was instituted pursuant to chapter 261, S. L. 1919 (secs. 13S6-1390, O. S. 1931), providing for such actions against unknown claimants as above' designated, and for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gardner v. School Dist. No. 87, Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Muskogee Times-Democrat v. Com'rs of Muskogee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gordon v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- In Re Turinsky's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- In Re Estate of StenzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- In Re Hunter's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. ZabloudilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.