Legal Opinion
Gust v. Soo Line Railroad
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 25, 1996No. 96-C-1165PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.. The plaintiff, Christopher A. Gust, is employed as a conductor by the defendant railroad company. He filed this action on October 10,1996 for injuries allegedly suffered by him on September 16, 1996, while he was *410engaged in the “course and scope” of his employment. This court’s jurisdiction is based on the Federal Employers’ Liability Act [“FELA”], 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60. Accompanying Mr. Gust’s complaint was a motion for a preliminary injunction. It is this motion that is presently before the court. The parties have stipulated that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Company, Cross-Appellant v. Railway Labor Executives' Association, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Junior S. Jackson, Cross-Appellant v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- James E. Hendley v. Central of Georgia Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chapman v. South Buffalo Railway Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999