Legal Opinion

Shinaberry v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 26, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 2485PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENT, District Judge.

Plaintiff has commenced this action in. an effort to restrain the Government from collecting penalties for violation of the Acts of Congress fixing wheat quotas,1 alleging that the same are unconstitutional.

The matter is before the Court on the-Government’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, first, because the complaint fails to state a claim against the-defendant upon which relief can be granted ; second, on the ground that the United States of America has not granted consent to be sued, and, third, because the-Secretary of Agriculture is an indispensable party and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Green River Drainage AreaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
  2. Haggard v. LancasterDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
  3. Albert Ginsberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. Landow v. CarmenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1983
  5. Shinaberry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API