Legal Opinion
Nesbitt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1980No. 78-2111PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The reasons for our affirmance were stated quite well in the district court’s opinion which appears in 445 F.Supp. 824 (N.D. Cal. 1978). We adopt Judge Renfrew’s opinion to the extent of Parts I, II, and III.A. As to Part III.B, we merely wish to hold that, to the extent an exception to section 3466 might exist for “perfected and specific liens,” the lien of the appellant was not sufficiently perfected and specific to come within any such exception.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nesbitt v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Estate of RomaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Durham v. UNITED STATES, BY CIRDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Abrams v. Union BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993