Legal Opinion

In re The Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 23, 1989No. MDL 378PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

THEIS, District Judge.

This case is before the court on the States’ Motion to Enforce the Final Settlement Agreement. The court has examined the briefs of the States, the Department of Energy (DOE), and amici curiae Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company. The court held oral argument on January 18, 1989, and is now prepared to rule.

In general terms, the States’ motion, which is their second such motion to enforce, asserts that the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the DOE has violated the terms of the Final Settlement Agreement (FSA)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1984
  2. In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption LitigationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. In re the Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation, M.D.L. No. 378Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API