Legal Opinion
Salazar v. Barnhart
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided November 3, 2004No. CIV.03-1235 RLPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PUGLISI, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Julie A. Salazar (“Salazar”) invokes this Court’s jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”). The Commissioner determined that Salazar was not eligible for supplemental security income benefits (“SSI”). Salazar moves this Court for an order reversing or remanding for a rehearing. [Doc. Nos. 11, 12.]
Salazar was born on December 22, 1967 and was 35 years old when the administrative hearing was held. [Tr. at 47, 97.] She attained a high…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Hawkins v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salazar v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Salazar v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Jahnke v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021