Legal Opinion

Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. Wells

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 23, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The available members of the Court who heard this appeal are equally divided and, following the practice of the Supreme Court of the United States, cf. Parker Seal Company v. Cummins, 429 U.S. 65, 97 S.Ct. 342, 50 L.Ed.2d 223 (1976), and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, cf. United States v. Altro, 3 Cir., 612 F.2d 575 (1979), the judgment of the Superi- or Court is affirmed.

DUFFY and HORSEY, Justices.

After two long and complex trials of this case in the Superior Court, in and for Sussex County, it is distressing to conclude that a third trial should be ordered but, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. MedingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  2. Parker Seal Co. v. CumminsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Delaware Olds, Inc. v. DixonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  4. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. WellsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Getty Oil Co. v. HeimSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barriocanal v. GibbsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. DeAngelis v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Quisenberry v. QuisenberryDelaware Family Court · 1982
  4. Husband B. W. D. v. Wife B. A. D.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Husband B. W. D. v. Wife B. A. D.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API