Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schroeder v. Department of Social Services

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1995No. 18517Published

1DissentMiller, Chief Justice

I dissent.

Contrary to the majority’s contention, the . absence of findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court does not prevent meaningful review of this case. State, Div. of Human Rights v. Miller, 349 N.W.2d 42 (S.D.1984), cited with approval by the majority, indicates that our review should focus on the agency’s record rather than the findings and conclusions of the trial court. If the circuit court has reversed the agency’s decision, and “[i]f after review of the evidence we deem the agency findings clearly erroneous, we affirm the circuit court. If the agency findings are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, Division of Human Rights Ex Rel. Miller v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Matter of SD Water Mgmt. Bd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of Ackerson, Karlen & SchmittSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Deuter v. South Dakota Highway PatrolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kienast v. Sioux Valley Co-OpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API