Legal Opinion

Donohue v. Dyer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Dyer, the appellee, sued Donohue, the appellant, in trespass. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled. Answer in denial. Trial by jury; finding and judgment for the plaintiff. Motion for a new trial overruled, and excepted to. The evidence is in the record by bill of exceptions. The defendant appeals.

Several errors' are assigned. The cause was submitted before the recent revision of the rules of this court. The appellant’s brief is short and meager, and presents but two points for our consideration, and we will only notice the points so presented.

It is claimed that the court erred in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kurpgeweit v. KirbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Scheible v. LawIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Colpoys v. ForemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  4. De Wolfe v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API