Legal Opinion · Dissent

James A. Rochelle v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 24, 2001No. Docket 18483-99Unknown

1DissentChabot, J.

The Congress decided that, if the Commissioner sent a notice of deficiency to a taxpayer, then the taxpayer should have help in determining the last date for petitioning this Court. The Congress decided to charge the Commissioner with the task of providing this help. The Congress decided to effectuate the foregoing by enacting that the Commissioner “shall include on each notice of deficiency” (emphasis added) the last date for petitioning this Court. Sec. 3463(a) of the 1998 Act.

The majority’s opinion may be read to permit, or perhaps even encourage, the Commissioner to ignore the obligation…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API