Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1921No. 6471PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Stephens. Tried below before the Honorable C. O. Hamlin., Appeal from a conviction of receiving stolen property fraudulently. Penalty, three years imprisonment in the penitentiary. Cited; Trinkle v. State, 225 S. W. Rep., 755; Harper v. State, 227 id., 190, and cases in opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for fraudulently receiving stolen property; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.

■ The indictment contains three counts: one charging appellant with theft of property from one J. J. Thompson; one charging him with theft of property from Tom Murray; and one charging him with fraudulently receiving property from some person whose name was unknown to the grand jury.

It is upon the last-named count that the conviction rests. It is necessary in the indictment to name the person from whom the property was received…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kahanek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Shockley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Trinkle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Harper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Payne v. StatedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Grimes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API