Legal Opinion

Kahanek v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1918No. 4850PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with receiving stolen property from George Clark and Joe Haffernik, which property was alleged to belong to J. A. Nachlinger.

The theory of the prosecution, as evidenced by the allegation in the indictment, was that Bachlinger owned a buggy and Clark and Haffernik stole it and sold it to appellant, and that the evidence would justify the jury in finding that appéllant at the time he bought it or received it knew it was stolen property.

The court charged the jury, over appellant’s exception duly reserved, that if defendant fraudulently received…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Meek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Payne v. StatedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Hardeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Metaxes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Gutierrez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API