Legal Opinion

State v. Woodland

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 1995No. 91PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether a witness’s prior conviction for possession of controlled dangerous substances with intent to distribute is admissible for purposes of impeachment under Maryland Rule 1-502.1 We hold that it is.

I

On March 21, 1992, on a street corner in Baltimore City, Jonathan Brickus was confronted by a stranger who claimed that Brickus had bumped into him. Brickus apologized, but the stranger was not satisfied; he punched Brickus in the back of the head, almost knocking him down, and then pulled *522out a handgun and fired two or three shots at him. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jesus OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Beales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. State v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Giddens v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. State v. WestpointCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Sutton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Diaz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API