State v. Woodland
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
This case presents the question of whether a witness’s prior conviction for possession of controlled dangerous substances with intent to distribute is admissible for purposes of impeachment under Maryland Rule 1-502.1 We hold that it is.
I
On March 21, 1992, on a street corner in Baltimore City, Jonathan Brickus was confronted by a stranger who claimed that Brickus had bumped into him. Brickus apologized, but the stranger was not satisfied; he punched Brickus in the back of the head, almost knocking him down, and then pulled *522out a handgun and fired two or three shots at him. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Jesus OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Beales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- State v. GiddensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Giddens v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State v. WestpointCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Sutton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Diaz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.