Legal Opinion
Curry v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 9, 1994No. 93-5358PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, James Curry, has brought this federal civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1 against the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (“Commission”), and individual members of the Commission. 2 Plaintiff was employed by the Commission as a fare collector. Sometime in early April, 1992, he was terminated for misappropriating funds. Curry claims that his discharge violated his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. 3 Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Larsen v. SENATE OF THE COM. OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Demko v. Luzerne County Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000