David Paul Hammer v. Larry Meachum, Director Oklahoma Department of Corrections and J. M. Sunderland
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1976). The issue is whether petitioner’s state procedural default precludes him from obtaining federal habeas review. We hold that it does.
Petitioner, an Oklahoma prisoner, pled guilty in May 1978 to charges of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Francis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nathan H. Cohen v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Edward C. Forman v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fred D. Ewing, Sr. v. Norris W. McMackinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- William E. Zellers v. Jack Duckworth, Warden, Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Shabazz v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pethtel v. Attorney General of IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- Wolfe v. ClarkeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.