Tate v. Knox
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover federal income taxes in the amount of $2,363.03, with interest, paid under protest, for the year 1947. The sole issue is whether a certain payment of money (hereinafter outlined) constitutes payment for the termination of an employment contract, thus subject to taxation as ordinary income, or a capital asset entitled to capital gain or loss treatment upon sale or exchange, under the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. 1
In the interest of clarity a summary of the pertinent facts may be helpful. For the most part the facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Michaels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
- Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- United States v. Ogilvie Hardware Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Podell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- Fishback v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1963
- CHURCH OF THE CHOSEN PEOPLE, ETC. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
- Daubón Belaval v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1977
- Flanders v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.