Legal Opinion

Tate v. Knox

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1955No. Civ. 2491PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover federal income taxes in the amount of $2,363.03, with interest, paid under protest, for the year 1947. The sole issue is whether a certain payment of money (hereinafter outlined) constitutes payment for the termination of an employment contract, thus subject to taxation as ordinary income, or a capital asset entitled to capital gain or loss treatment upon sale or exchange, under the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. 1

In the interest of clarity a summary of the pertinent facts may be helpful. For the most part the facts are undisputed.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Michaels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  3. Rehnberg v. Minnesota Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. United States v. Ogilvie Hardware Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Podell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  2. Fishback v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1963
  3. CHURCH OF THE CHOSEN PEOPLE, ETC. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
  4. Daubón Belaval v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1977
  5. Flanders v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API