Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 2011No. 07FE0142; A142178PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant, a member of the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of his seizure and arrest by a Madras City Police Officer who pursued defendant onto the Warm Springs Reservation, arrested him there, placed him in a Madras City Police car, and drove him to a jail off the reservation. Relying on the Warm Springs Tribal Code (WSTC) “hot pursuit” provision, WSTC 310.120, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to suppress. We conclude that the trial court correctly applied WSTC 310.120 and, therefore, did not err in denying defendant’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. Spotted HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James v. ReconTrust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. KellerMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API