Legal Opinion

Wauwatosa Realty Co. v. Bishop

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

Defendants in their motion to reopen the summary judgment filed a proposed answer in which they set forth that an officer of the plaintiff corporation had fraud ulently and falsely represented to the defendants between March 1 and March 10, 1955, that the purchasers had not been able to qualify for the first mortgage and that relying upon said false and fraudulent representations of one of the agents of plaintiff corporation, the defendants refused to close the transaction on any other terms except those in the agreement, and were thereby induced to break the contract.

We conclude that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laughnan v. GriffithsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Melms v. Pabst Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Zuelke v. GergoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Kruger v. WesnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AllesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Humphrey v. Elk Creek Lake Protection & Rehabilitation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Trecker v. ScagDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Lake Beulah Management District v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  5. Secord v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API