Legal Opinion
Cormack v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] There is no conflict in the evidence as to the condition of things which prevented the train in which the plaintiff was a passenger from getting into the defendant's station at Boston on the night of the 2nd of January, 1904. The weather was extremely cold — the temperature ranging from six degrees Fahrenheit to zero — and the wind was blowing hard and a heavy snow storm prevailed, of such proportions as to be ordinarily denominated in America a blizzard. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weed v. . the Panama Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- McArthur v. SearsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Merritt v. . EarleNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Pruitt v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Parsons v. HardyNew York Supreme Court · 1835
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Donkor v. British Airways, Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Barnet v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Barnet v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Curry v. Norwood Electric Light & Power Co., New York County Courts1925
- Lamb v. MitchellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.