Legal Opinion

Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. v. Department of Revenue

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2012No. 85556-1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.

¶1 Washington’s Business and Occupation (B&O) tax system imposes taxes on refining of oil products and, separately, on sales. The gross income from activities, from which each tax is calculated, can be reduced by certain statutory deductions. The issue here is whether the RCW 82.04.433(1) deduction applies to reduce B&O tax on sales and whether the statute allows a reduction of B&O tax for processing the same product (i.e., manufacturing activities).

¶2 The Court of Appeals held that Tesoro Refining and Marketing could deduct the amount of its “offshore”1 bunker fuel sales from its B&O taxes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dot Foods, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Bell v. HeflinWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Dept. Of Revenue v. Gamestop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Department Of Revenue, V Gamesstop, Inc And Socom, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Dot Foods, Inc. v. Dep't of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API