Legal Opinion

Bell v. Heflin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2016No. 92620-4PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) (ch. 26.21A RCW) governs how Washington courts are to enforce child support orders issued by courts in other states. In this case, we must clarify under which of UIFSA’s choice-of-law rules our state’s nonclaim statutes fall. Relying on the comments to UIFSA and other states’ interpretations of UIFSA, we hold that under UIFSA’s choice of law provision, a statute authorizing wage withholding is a “remedy,” whereas a nonclaim statute is a “statute of limitation.” After comparing the two statutes of limitations applicable in this case, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re the Marriage of SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re the Marriage of HunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Christine Crabtree v. Donald Clinton CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. Pierce County v. Richard E. SorrelsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. Ronald C. Moates, V. Deidre D. MoatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. State Of Washington v. D'angelo A SaloyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State Of Washington v. D'angelo A SaloyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API