Smith v. Buse
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried by Lochren, J., without a jury. The validity of the mortgage foreclosure involved in this action was considered in Bottineau v. ¿Etna Life Ins. Go., 31 Minn. 125.
1Opinion of the CourtGtleillan, C. J.
The plaintiff brings this action under the statute to determine adverse claims to lots 10 and 11, section 15, township 151, range 44, alleging that he is the owner, and that the same are vacant and unoccupied. The defendants deny plaintiff’s title* aud allege title in the defendants, Mary R. Bottineau, Eliza Buse, and Edward Grussendorf. For reply the plaintiff alleges the execution, January 6, 1876, by Mary Bottineau and her husband, prior to her conveyances to the other two defendants, to the iEtna Life Insur-*235anee Company, of a mortgage upon said lots and other real estate, with the usual…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Swanson v. Realization & Debenture Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Todd v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Larocque v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Lindgren v. LindgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Hudson v. Upper Michigan Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925