Legal Opinion

Lindgren v. Lindgren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1898No. Nos. 11,066-(164)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Swante A. Lindgren and Anna Lindgren, Ms wife, and Nils O. Werner, as receiver of the rents and profits of their real estate, to foreclose a mortgage. Defendant Swante A. Lindgren did not appear, and the other defendants answered jointly.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Hennepin county against Swante A. Lindgren and Anna Lindgren, Ms wife, and Nils O. Werner, as receiver of the rents and profits of their real estate, to foreclose a mortgage. Defendant Swante A. Lindgren did not appear, and the other defendants answered jointly. The case was tried before Belden, J., who found as facts, among other things, as follows: The mortgage was executed May 19, 1888, by the Lindgrens to Michael and Lars Munson to secure the principal sum of $8,000, evidenced by the note of the mortgagors. By a judgment rendered December 10, 1891, Mr. and…

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Nearly all of the facts of consequence here were stated in Werner v. Lindgren, 56 Minn. 309, 57 N. W. 793. When that case was remanded judgment was entered in the court below, in accordance with the conclusions of law, and then, in 1895, plaintiff, one of the defendants in that action, instituted this action to foreclose the mortgage in question, making both of the mortgagors, husband and wife, and the receiver, Werner, parties defendant, and alleging title to the note and mortgage by sale and assignment. The complaint was in the usual form in such cases, but in addition alleged the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hall v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Rogers v. BentonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Frost v. PlumbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  4. Castner v. GuntherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
  5. Gammons v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leckband v. NaylorDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
  2. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Preston v. JungeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Halverson (In Re Solberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
  4. Hudson v. Upper Michigan Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API