Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 30, 1978No. Civ. 75-71935PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS'
CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, District Judge.
This action was brought by Jessie M. Schroeder against Dayton-Hudson Corporation alleging jurisdiction on the basis of certain federal statutory rights as well as diversity of citizenship. The plaintiff is a Michigan citizen, while the defendant is a foreign corporation with its principal place of business in a state other than Michigan which does business in Michigan under the name J. L. Hudson Company. The complaint alleges that she began employment with J. L. Hudson Co.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Joseph L. Dombrowski v. Jack Dowling and Arthur Rubloff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Barbara Girard v. 94th Street and Fifth Avenue CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- 37 Fair empl.prac.cas. 8, 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,996 Loren B. Miller, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. International Telephone and Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Miller v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Schreiner v. McKENZIE TANK LINES, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.