Lamont v. Haig
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Defendants moved to dismiss this case on the grounds that there is a lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants, that the allegations of the complaint are vague, conclusory, and insufficient, and that the plaintiffs have failed to state a claim as to either their claim for violations of their constitutional rights or their claim for violations of several federal criminal statutes, including the Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1385. After due consideration of the briefs and argument of the parties, the Court must find that it…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Robinson v. Overseas Military Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Jameson v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Bissonette v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Brakke v. RudnickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- French v. GabrielCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.