Legal Opinion

Heffner v. Board of County Commissioners

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1896No. 2201PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish. County.— Hon. John C. Denney, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

The respondent moves the court to strike the statement of facts from the record herein *274on the ground that the statement is not permissible under the law, for the alleged reason that it is composed of affidavits which were introduced in evidence at the hearing in the court below, and filed with the clerk. The contention of the respondent is that the affidavits should have been included in the transcript certified by the clerk as part of the files, as provided in § 14 of the act of March 8, 1893, relating to appeals. Laws 1893, p. 126. As…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Comm'rs of Marshall Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  2. Parmeter v. BourneWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People, Ex Rel. Smith v. . SchielleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Windt v. BannizaWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Krieschel v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Case v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State Ex Rel. Porter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Whittaker v. WellerWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Orchard v. Board of Com'rs of Sierra CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Zarelli v. Superior Distributing Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API