Legal Opinion

United States v. Austin DeCoster

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 6, 2016No. 15-1890; 15-1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Austin “Jack” DeCoster and Peter De-Coster both pled guilty, as “responsible corporate officers” of Quality Egg, LLC, to misdemeanor violations of 21 U.S.C. § 331(a) for introducing eggs that had been adulterated with salmonella enteritid-is into interstate commerce. The district court1 sentenced Jack and Peter to three months imprisonment. The DeCosters appeal, arguing that their prison sentences and 21 U.S.C. § 333(a)(1) are unconstitutional, and claiming in the alternative that their prison sentences were procedurally and substantively unreasonable. We affirm.

I

Jack…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SvirskiyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. State v. GedroseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State of Iowa, Ex Rel., Iowa Department of Natural Resources v. Donald Lilly and Ronald Albrecht; and Global Fiberglass Solutions, Inc.; GFS Holdings Group, LLC; Global Fiberglass Solutions of Texas, LLC; and GFSI-MHE Manufacturing of Texas, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API