Brunner v. Ringe
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 159, Oct. T., 1913, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. No. 5, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1912, No. 4,252, dismissing bill in equity in case of Lamar F. Brunner and Blanche deB. Brunner v. John H. Hinge, Jr., and Margaret F. Ringe. Bill in equity for the cancellation of a deed and for an accounting. Before Ralston, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
The bill of the plaintiffs avers that, on and prior to April 29, 1898, Blanche deB. Brunner was the wife of Lamar F. Brunner; that the said wife was, on said day, seized in fee of one-sixth interest in three certain ground rents; that on said day the said husband and wife did execute and deliver to the defendant Margarethe F. Ringe, wife of John H. Ringe, Jr., a deed conveying all the title and interest of said Blanche in said ground rents to the said Margarethe F. Ringe, a copy of the said deed being attached to and made part of the bill; that said Margarethe F. Ringe…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- Glidden v. StruplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Appeal of GrimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- McCoy v. NiblickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Long's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wharen Et Ux. v. Funk Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Lucey EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1958