Legal Opinion

People v. Wassen

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 21, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles J. Heffernan, Jr., J.

On its facts, this is a case of first impression. Defendant *663stands charged with driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2]) and related charges based upon his operation of an automobile in New York County in the early morning hours of December 20, 1989. The People seek to introduce at trial evidence that defendant refused to submit to a breathalyzer test.

Defendant has moved, for the third time, to suppress evidence of this refusal.1 Each motion was based on the ground of denied access to counsel. Notwithstanding the denials…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. People v. GurseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Finocchairo v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. People v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. RinaldiChili Justice Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MarteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. People v. MarteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. People v. WassenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API