Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Frazee v. Frazee

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1983No. 14042Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBistline, Justice

There is much in the Court’s opinion with which I agree, but I do. not see any necessity for overruling Renfro v. Nixon, 55 Idaho 532, 45 P.2d 595 (1935), to any extent whatever. The facts gleanable from the Court’s opinion in my view are more easily followed in the findings of Judge Black, which I summarize and interpolate with dates and other facts.(1) Stipulation signed by both parties and their attorneys, June 5, 1979, drawn by Reginald Reeves on stationery of Denman & Reeves.

*467(2) Decree of divorce entered, June 7, 1979, embodying the property provisions of the stipulation, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Compton v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Skelton v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Renfro v. NixonIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Mercer v. MercerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Perovitz v. PerovitzIdaho Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API