Hirsch v. Weisman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered July 11, 1991, to the extent that it granted plaintiffs’ request for leave to serve their amended complaint upon additional defendants Zuller & Bondy and Thomas Bondy, Esq., unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, that portion of their motion is denied, and the action is severed and continued against defendant Weisman, without costs.
The issue is whether the Statute of Limitations has run against the additional defendants in this essentially legal-malpractice action, or whether a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brock v. BuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Video Corp. of America v. Frederick Flatto Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Kiser v. BaileyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977
- Grennan v. Well Built Sales of Richmond County, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vogel v. LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Moonlight Enters., LLC v. MrozSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Cappadonna v. Simon, Sarver, Friedman & RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Shroff v. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.