Rookstool v. Neaf
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Commissioner.
Plaintiff, as the former spouse of decedent, Fred Weidman, sought specific performance of an alleged oral contract, made just prior to their 1952 divorce, that each of them would keep their existing mutual and reciprocal last wills and testaments in force and not revoke them. ' Decedent and the plaintiff did not personally revoke their wills, but § 474.420 (all statutory references are to RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S.) below set forth, in terms revokes provisions in a will executed prior to the divorce for a divorced spouse. From an adverse judgment of the trial court, plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walker v. BohannanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Hale v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1894
- Brown v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
- Canada v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Gould v. MansfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meyer v. Texas National Bank of Commerce of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Pointer v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- In re the Estate of LampshireNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
- Chandler v. Estate of RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Shumate v. DuganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.