Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 19, 1923No. C-13PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*191MEMORANDUM

BY THE COURT.

The petition in this case does not allege a cause of action. It is nowhere alleged that the embargo established was in anywise contrary to law, and it does not appear that the defendant otherwise failed to observe its obligations under the contract of sale. The plaintiff directed the manner of shipment, and specifically pointed out how it should be carried out. The defendant in good faith endeavored to comply with the plaintiff’s directions, but was forestalled in so doing by the establishment of an embargo, and it will not avail the plaintiff to simply allege the fact…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deming v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bateson-Stolte, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Gothwaite v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  3. Aragona Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  5. Town of Kure Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API