Legal Opinion

State v. . Wilcox

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.

If a defendant in a criminal action voluntarily testifies in his own behalf, does the law “presume when a man is being tried for crime, that he is naturally laboring under a temptation to testify to whatever he thinks may be necessary to clear himself of the charge,” and in scrutinizing his testimony in order to determine its credibility and weight, must the jury take “into consideration what a conviction would mean to him and the temptation under which he labors to' swear to whatever he thinks is necessary to clear himself?”

The trial judge charged the jury as follows:

“Another rule of law it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . EflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. State v. . O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. State v. TraylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. . RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. State v. . DeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API