Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Nelson Electric
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 1991No. 88-C-1213-PPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR JNOV ON THE INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS JURY CLAIM, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON TITLE VII NON-JURY CLAIM, AND JUDGMENT
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Deborah Marshall (“Marshall”), after being laid off by her employer, Nelson Electric, filed the instant action alleging violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendants are Nelson Electric and Luther Noah (“Noah”).
Marshall alleged Noah, an employee of Nelson Electric who served as a foreman…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lambert v. Genesee HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Neufeld v. NeufeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Lambert v. Genesee HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Foley v. Mobil Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Bonner v. GuccioneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.