Legal Opinion
Darin & Armstrong, Inc. v. Monte Costella, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 2, 1989No. 88-2078PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.
Darin & Armstrong, Inc., [Darin] appeals the entry of an order denying its motion to vacate an arbitration award. Finding no error in the trial court’s decision, we affirm.
Darin hired Monte Costella, Inc., [Costel-la] to perform masonry work as part of the renovation of Miami Heart Institute. The contract between the parties provided that in the event of a dispute the parties would submit to binding arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules. When problems developed in the performance of the contract, the parties underwent arbitration. The final…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oyer v. BoyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Brautigam v. MacVicarSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Klinefelter v. American Employers Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State ex rel. Caraker v. AmidonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Department of Insurance v. First Floridian Auto & Home InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Constructora Estelar, S.E. v. Autoridad De Edificios PúblicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
- Constructora Estelar, S.E. v. Autoridad de Edificios PúblicosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
- State v. FIRST FLORIDIAN AUTO INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001