Legal Opinion
Bockel v. Rudman
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 15, 1874No. 5012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from the Seventh Judicial District Court, parish of Pointe Coupee. Farrar, Judge ad hoo. Jury trial.
1Opinion of the CourtWtlt, J.
In this case the judge fixed no amount for an appeal *209bond. A suspensive appeal was granted on appellants giving bond conditioned according to law.
The amount of the appeal bond is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal. It will not do for a devolutive appeal, because it is not for an amount fixed by the judge. The motion to dismiss on this ground must therefore prevail.
It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at appellants’ costs.
Rehearing refused.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Succession of LynchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Pan-American Bank & Trust Co. v. RansomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921