Legal Opinion

Noble v. Ternyik

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1975PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

This is a defamation action. Plaintiff alleged the defendant, a member of a port commission, slandered him during the course of a port commission meeting. Defendant demurred to the complaint. The trial court first overruled the demurrer, then reconsidered and sustained the demurrer. Plaintiff appeals.

The facts are to be considered as alleged in the complaint, and as admitted by plaintiff. The port commission held a public hearing attended by the defendant as a commission member. Someone proposed that the commission obtain a registered brand to mark the port’s logs. During the discussion of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Holden v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ivie v. MintonOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Demers v. MeuretOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Munn v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pierson v. HubbardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. Sanchez v. CoxonArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kraemer v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Beason v. HarcleroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API