Legal Opinion

Santoro v. Ramsey

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1985No. C3-84-2155Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Nanci E. Santoro appeals from the trial court’s order dated November 13, 1984, denying an increase in child support because there was no showing of a substantial change of circumstances as required by Minn.Stat. § 518.64, subd. 2 (1984). We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Nanci Santoro and respondent William Ramsey were divorced on September 17, 1976. Santoro was awarded custody of the parties’ minor child, and Ramsey was ordered to pay $100.00 per month for child support.

In 1983, Santoro moved to increase child support. The court increased the child support to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hadrava v. HadravaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Heaton v. HeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. In Re the Marriage of Meyer v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API