Legal Opinion

Haynes v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1964No. 3534PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction for indecent exposure in violation of Code 1961, § 22-1112(a). Appellant contends that the testimony of the complaining witness was not corroborated, that the trial court gave improper weight to the testimony of the character witnesses who appeared in his behalf, and that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.1

On the night of October 26, 1963, Elizabeth Epstein, the complaining witness, and her friend, Ellen Schwartz, went to the movies. They returned to their college dormitory about midnight and since it was a pleasant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Konvalinka v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Danilo Konvalinka v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  4. Haynes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nassif v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API