Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Ticktin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 21, 2009No. SC07-369PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Peter David Ticktin, a member of The Florida Bar, be found guilty of professional misconduct and ad monished. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve the referee’s findings of fact, his recommendations as to guilt, and his findings in aggravation and mitigation, with the exception of the finding in mitigation of imposition of other penalties or sanctions. However, we disapprove the recommended discipline of admonishment. Instead, we impose a ninety-one-day suspension.

BACKGROUND

The Bar filed a two-count complaint…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. The Florida Bar v. GermainSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. The Florida Bar v. BarrettSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. RatinerSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Florida Bar v. DohertySupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  3. The Florida Bar v. Jon Douglas ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. Florida Bar v. ShankmanSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  5. People v. WatersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API