Legal Opinion
Wardman Const. Co. v. Flynn
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 7, 1931No. 5221 (Law No. 73086)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
The appellee, Elynn, as plaintiff below, claimed judgment against the Wardman Construction Company, as defendant, in the sum of $1,618.51 for services as a real estate agent rendered by plaintiff for defendant. The claim of indebtedness was denied by defendant. A set-off also was pleaded.
The decisive question of fact presented by the pleadings was whether the plaintiff had purchased Apartment No. 308 in the Clydesdale Apartment House from defendant, and whether he still owed defendant for part of the purchase price thereof. This was asserted by defendant and denied by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Sena v. American Turquoise Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hicks v. BigelowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Glennon v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- 1915 16TH ST. CO-OP. ASS'N v. PinkettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- 1915 16TH ST. CO-OP. ASS'N v. PinkettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951