Legal Opinion

In re Conzelman

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana

Decided January 21, 1987No. Bankruptcy No. 86-20482PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOHN L. PETERSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Court is whether the Montana exemption statute applicable in a bankruptcy case, codified at Section 31-2-106 MCA (1985), which denies the Debtor an exemption he would be entitled to under the federal bankruptcy statute, 11 U.S.C. § 522(d), is unconstitutional. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds Section 31-2-106 MCA is constitutional.

On October 9, 1986, the Trustee filed a motion requesting an order from this Court requiring turnover of Worker’s Compensation benefits being received by the Debtor as property of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. J. Kenneth Rhodes, Debtor v. Larry Stewart, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. In the Matter of Scott Reynolds Sullivan, Debtor-Appellant. United States of America, Intervening-Appellee. In Re Willis Wayne West, Debtor-Appellant. State of Illinois, Intervening-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Daniel J. YONIKUS and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YONIKUSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API