Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Mahlke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The trial court, the plaintiff, and the defendant approached the solution of the issue in this case from divergent points of view. The trial court’s written opinion indicated the alleged alienation was not finally accomplished more than a year prior to the commencement of the action because the plaintiff did not lose all hope of re-establishing the society and companionship of his former wife prior to the judgment of divorce. The plaintiff contends the only proper time to commence an action for alienation of affections is after a decree of divorce had been entered, arguing public policy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Paulson v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Maahs v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Harris v. KunkelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Zezblatt v. SampsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dottai v. AltenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Jahns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Clark v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Schandelmeier v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Halverson v. TydrichCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API