Legal Opinion
Bell v. Bell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 10, 1949No. 16781PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
In Huguley v. Huguley, 204 Ga. 692 (2) (51 S. E. 2d, 445), it was held: “Under the act of 1946 (Ga. L. 1946, p. 90), it is only in cases where a divorce is granted that a petition to modify or set aside a verdict or judgment must be filed 'within thirty days as a prerequisite to any review in the Supreme Court. Where a divorce is denied, a review by a motion for new trial, without such petition to modify or set aside, is an available procedure authorized by the Code, § 30-130.” In the Huguley case (at page 697), it was pointed out that this ruling was contrary to a statement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huguley v. HuguleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Christopher v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Pennaman v. PennamanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Norman v. AultSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Copeland v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Oliver v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Brown v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.